2000 Chevrolet Metro review from North America
"Great cheap car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Alternator @ 50k
Front and rear shocks
Radio
breaks.
General comments?
I guess you get what you pay for. The metro is very cheap to buy, and very cheap to operate, but it has its price. It is the most gutless vehicle I've driven (0-60 timed at 12.5s, 11s with a K&N filter). Under warranty, a couple things went on it, but overall it is fairly reliable, as it doesn't really have many complicated parts. I would recommend this vehicle, but don't expect too much resale.
Recommended reviews
| Affordable and dependable not classy |
|
| 1999 - Metro LSi 1.3L gasoline Great Gas Saver!!! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model year | 2000 |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 0 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 4 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 3 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 60000 kilometres |
| Date of Entry | 21st November, 2005 |