2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS review from North America
"Fast and beautiful!!!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I have had no problems at all. I have owned a 1996 a 1999 and now a 2002.ALL have had no real problems. ANYONE that has had problems most likely was abuse or neglect on there part.
General comments?
OVERALL I believe that GM has the handle on these cars. VERY nicely designed for function and comfort. HAS more power and options then you would expect from higher priced autos.
Recommended reviews
| It is a sporty and fast car |
|
| 2001 - Monte Carlo SS 3.8 SERIES II Nice car, but not for the squeamish |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 2002 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.4 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 10 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 8 miles |
| Most recent distance | 2500 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Monte Carlo |
| Date of Entry | 24th May, 2002 |