1997 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS review from North America
"A safe, reliable, well built car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The alternator had to be replaced at 40000 miles.
General comments?
This vehicle, while it appears sporty, is a perfect example as to why you should never judge a book by its cover. Whereas many other vehicles in this price range can command power and speed to make Hemingway proud, it seems at times the vehicle wishes to plod on like a James Joyce novel. If you're willing to abuse your gas pedal you can squeeze some power from the engine.
The car apparently has a touring suspension which limits its cornering and acceleration capabilities, though it enhances the feel of being in a slightly more upscale Chevy.
On the other hand the interior is rather roomy and well appointed. Imitation wood panel inserts and a chrome Monte Carlo name plate in the cabin add a touch of class.
The factory sound system has served very well and has weathered quite a bit of high volume punishment.
Speaking of punishment, I personally wrecked this car by taking out a barbed wire fence at around 90 miles per hour and the only repairs other than some hose replacement were to the body panels and windshield. At more than $4000 worth of damage, the vehicle was still sound mechanically and has given me no problems since. As for myself, I walked away from the wreck unscathed (much to the surprise of the highway patrol), living proof that the time taken by GM in making this vehicle safe for its passengers was well spent.
My only real problem with the vehicle is in its lack of power worthy of its name.
Recommended reviews
![]() ![]() | The most fun you can have with front wheel drive on a budget |
![]() ![]() | High maintenance, low value! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.1 Liter Automatic |
| Performance marks | 4/10 |
| Reliability marks | 7/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 36000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 48000 miles |
| Previous car | Oldsmobile Cutlass |
| Date of Entry | 3rd September, 2002 |

