1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Z34 review from North America
"Very big disappointment"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Transmission replaced by the dealer at 15,000 miles.
Transmission needed total rebuild at 29,000 miles.
Alternator replaced at 30,000 miles.
Transmission needed total rebuild at 32,000 miles.
General comments?
I love this car for it's sportiness, but don't know why I have put up with it this long. It has truly been a disappointment considering the price paid for it.
Definitely has a mechanical defect, making it blow transmissions.
Looks great, but runs terrible.
It handles exceptionally well when it's running.
Recommended reviews
| 1996 - Monte Carlo Z34 3.4L V6 Fast, sporty, reliable car that just costs a little more to maintain. |
|
| 1995 - Monte Carlo Z34 3.4 DOHC V6 Sharp car, but stay away from the 3.4L engine... NOTHING but problems!!!! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1996 |
| First year of ownership | 1996 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.4 liter Automatic |
| Performance marks | |
| Reliability marks | 4 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 17 miles |
| Most recent distance | 34500 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Cavalier |
| Date of Entry | 17th April, 2003 |