Similar Chevrolet Monte Carlo reviews

1987
USA Flag Canada Flag

Monte Carlo SS aerocoupe

Lots of fun definitely worth looking into

69 words
1986
USA Flag Canada Flag

Monte Carlo Sport Coupe

A beautiful car with potential, for the first time drivers, or the car enthusiast

542 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Monte Carlo

Can't say enough about it

488 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Monte Carlo SS

Love at first sight

451 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Monte Carlo LS

Beyond Words

361 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Monte Carlo Sport Coupe

A fond childhood memory

353 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Monte Carlo LS

A perfect car for a young kid who wants to show off

300 words
All Chevrolet Monte Carlo reviews

1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS review from North America

"Love at first sight"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Quadrajet needed to be rebuilt.

Torque Converter Clutch solenoid wore out (typical of the 200 4-R)

Worn rear tires.

Brakes needed replacement.

Cylinder bore wear.

Previous owner left only the manifolds as an exhaust system.

The cheap, generic cam in the newly-implanted 350 didn't break in. Instead, it demolished the bearings and took out a lifter.

T-Tops leak a little bit.

Wheel well and trunk lid rust.

General comments?

For as long as I can remember, I've loved the Monte Carlo SS. Something about its looks resonated with me. Something about the sound of a small-block V8 got the adrenaline pumping. Something about torque turning the rear wheels felt so right. I knew I had to have one.

When I finally got one... well, maybe I should have kept looking. My particular car is far from a perfect example of what a fourth generation Monte Carlo SS should be.

When I got it, the stock L69 305 "H.O." was pretty far from high output. I think "Highly Tired" fit it better.

The transmission was acting up, in typical fashion.

The "exhaust system" the previous owner left me did nothing to promote anything resembling mileage or performance.

With work, it got better. A new exhaust system brought drive ability. Rebuilding the Quadrajet brought performance to the table for the first time. Replacing the Throttle Position Sensor after it went south kept the good times rolling.

Then the motor started to show it's age. The previous owner didn't take very good care of the car, and it was beginning to show. In the form of about a quart of blow-by a week.

I built a mild, non-emissions 350 to replace it, and it was FUN! For about 700 miles. The cam had steadily been wearing the wrong way, and then it finally died, taking my oil pressure with it.

Even after that, I still have the car, and still have faith in it. Through all the problems I've had, I still have a desire to sink money into it.

That car, as a package, was incredible. Power was an uphill battle with my bad luck, but everything else was perfect. It could corner almost on par with my 1994 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS, but it didn't punish you when you just wanted to cruise.

The Monte Carlo SS is, to me, the ultimate cruiser. It turned, it burned, and I could comfortable bring 3 people and quite a bit of luggage along for the ride.

I try to hate that car, but I can't. Even with the power-train mishaps, I love it. There was room for improvement (ahem, like a World Class T5 five speed manual transmission), but it's a solid platform for a wonderful driver.

1 comment

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Year of manufacture1986
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission L69 305 H.O Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks  
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired94000 miles
Most recent distance107000 miles
Previous carMitsubishi Eclipse
Date of Entry 14th August, 2004

All Chevrolet Monte Carlo reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews