2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS from North America - Comments

2nd May 2005, 16:07

"Nice peppy, sporty car with good gas mileage"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

The radio had to be changed twice.

General comments?

Not a true sports car.

But it's so close most people won't notice.


22nd Feb 2009, 10:57

How is this not a true sports car?

How is, stiff sport suspension, 200+ horsepower not a sports car? How is the ONLY last big bodied 2 door car on the road today not a sports car?

I'd really like to know.


23rd Feb 2009, 10:47

The term "sports car" has no meaning anymore. At one time it referred to a two-seat roadster with a convertible top, and if you wanted to get really picky about it, side curtains instead of crank windows.

But when people who bought Mustangs and Camaros in the 1960's started calling them "sports cars", it paved the way for anyone who had a car with the least bit of "sport" styling to claim it was a "sports car". So there were people calling their Dodge Dart GT or Chevrolet Nova SS a "sports car". Even the manufacturers got in on it, with Nissan claiming their Maxima was a "4DSC" (four-door sports car).

So who cares whether someone thinks a Monte Carlo is a sports car, or thinks it is not? The term does not mean anything anymore!

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Chevrolet Monte Carlo reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews