2000 Chevrolet Tahoe Z-71 from North America - Comments

7th Apr 2005, 23:20

"Get rid of it before 50,00 miles!"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

86,00 miles lost fuel pump.

86,000 miles lost water pump, 86,000 miles lost transmission

86,000 miles loosing cat.converter.

Thank God I took out 100,000 bumper to bumper warranty on this SUV! It covered everything except the cat. converter. ($900)

General comments?

Shame you can't count on a Chevy to last 100,000 miles any more!

All of my Tahoe failures occured in less the 24hours!

Otherwise, I love the Tahoe Z-71 and it's power and room.


12th Jun 2005, 13:15

What happened at 86,000 miles that three items went out approximately same time? Seens highly unusual, unless vehicle being driven extremely fast, lost water and continued to drive, etc.


3rd Feb 2006, 17:52

I own a 2000 Tahoe LT and it has over 100k miles. The only problem I've had, to date, is I needed a new fuel sending unit, which the dealer told me was a common thing with this year Tahoe. Otherwise, I get great mileage; 17mpg for what it is, that's awesome, and it runs drives and looks like new. Sorry you had so much trouble, but one has to think that you were using the vehicle in a way it was not meant to be. It's not a race car, after all.


18th Dec 2007, 11:04

I don't understand your hatred. I have a 1999 Tahoe LS with 177,982 miles. been wrecked twice.. and the only thing that died was some computer sensor. and its very fast for an SUV.. stock I can wipe expeditions and explorers off of the road.


28th Apr 2008, 01:47

The difference with your Tahoes is that they are not 4x4, the 2wd Tahoes are great. But the 4x4 z71 Tahoes have way too many problems.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Chevrolet Tahoe reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews