1993 Chrysler Concorde review from North America
"One that is best avoided"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Just about everything except for the brakes:
- Water pump.
- Catalytic converter.
- Remote keyless entry (the car would open the trunk and unlock the doors by itself!)
- Front wheel bearings.
- Horn (would blare constantly!)
- Automatic climate control.
- Tape deck.
- Sway bar links.
- Leaking rear strut.
- Transmission started to shift harshly.
- Struts that hold the hood up.
General comments?
The reliability of this car was a joke! I previously had a 1987 Pontiac 6000 with over 200,000 miles that didn't have half the problems this car did.
On a positive note, my former Concorde looked great and handled beautifully for such a large car.
I loved all the gadgets and accessories (when they worked).
Braking with the standard ABS was also excellent.
Dual airbags were a definite safety advantage.
I got rid of mine when the transmission started to act up, after only a year of owning it.
Good riddance!
Recommended reviews
| Worth what I bought it for, but the repairs are too costly |
|
| The money monster |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 1993 |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.3L V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 2 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 2 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 90000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 104000 miles |
| Previous car | Pontiac 6000 LE |
| Date of Entry | 2nd April, 2001 |