1997 Chrysler Concorde review from North America
"Not worth the cost of repair"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The car is a good car to look at and all, but when it comes to the repairs and cost to fix it, it's not worth the pain of it.
It was a gift to me, but I spent 2,000 on the motor cause a rod was thrown in the engine. So I fixed it, and then I ran into the same problem 3 months later. The check engine light was on and they couldn't say what the problem was. So now my car is dead cause the rpm was off and would ride parallel to the gas hand. I don't know what's wrong with it.
General comments?
It's good on gas and it's fast enough, but it has hidden problems under the hood. I would want another car.
Recommended reviews
| Good performance, but poor reliability and costly repairs |
| Chrysler - Engineered to be great cars...Literally! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 1997 |
| First year of ownership | 2006 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2006 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 2 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 1 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 1 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 1000000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 18th March, 2007 |