Similar Chrysler LeBaron reviews

1990
USA Flag Canada Flag

LeBaron Premium

Fun in the sun

47 words
1989
USA Flag Canada Flag

LeBaron Highline convertible

An excellent value for your dollar, but remember, it's old.

1063 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

LeBaron Turbo Coupe

I want another one!

475 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

LeBaron

Super, super car, in its category and for the money

368 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

LeBaron Coupe

Rice rocket slayer. Go America!!

349 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

LeBaron Convertable

A quick whip at a low price

321 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

LeBaron GTC

Engineering perfection, will always drive one

304 words
All Chrysler LeBaron reviews

1989 Chrysler LeBaron review from North America

"Super, super car, in its category and for the money"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Radiator needed replacement, approx. 98,000 miles.

Head gasket needed replacement, approx. 150,000 miles.

General comments?

I have owned 2 LeBarons. A 1986 Mark Cross Convertible with 2.2 turbo and currently, a 1989 coupe 2.5 turbo. Both have been very enjoyable cars with really comfortable interiors and wonderful seats.

Power is more than adequate (remember, these are not high-performance turbos). Ride quality is very good, the ’86 had a feel like a larger American luxury car. The ’89 drives a bit tighter, more responsive, but still solid, and heavy (in a good way).

The small 4 cyl. Chrysler products from the '80s were, overall, very good cars. Please note - many of the earliest LeBarons came with 2.6L 4 cylinder Mitsubishi engines, and from 1990 - 1995 with 3.0L 6 cyl. Mitsubishis. Those engines were low power / performance, and a little costly to repair (ie: 3.0L water pump).

The Chrysler 4 cyl. engines, on the other hand, were well engineered and offered increased horsepower through the years. Yes, as most engines, they have their weaknesses (don't let them overheat - the aluminum head can warp). Generally, they were well-built and long-lived if maintained correctly.

The reader who posted on 29th Dec 2007 and said these cars were problematic was not well informed. The trannies were more than adequate - these were not high-performance cars even with the turbo, except the Turbo IV engine - only available with 5 speed.

There were occasional turbo problems, as almost all turbo-ed cars of the era had. This was because owners were never told to cool down the turbo before shutting off the engine!

I bought my '89 coupe 2.5 turbo at 97,000 miles. It drove so well, it felt like a car with no more than 40K miles - tight, solid, well-built, and no squeaks or rattles.

Sadly, Chrysler did cheapen the car in 1990 with a minor make-over, and went with the 3.0L Mits. engine I mentioned above. The car had more plastic content. For instance, although having an appealing dashboard design, it felt and looked cheap. They also didn’t stay tight and squeak-free into high mileage.

The ‘80s Chrysler, Dodge, and Plymouth with Chrysler 4 bangers, were economical, reliable, and comfortable.

Comment on this review

Recommended reviews

USA Flag Canada Flag

1989 - LeBaron Turbo Coupe 2.5 turbo

I want another one!

USA Flag Canada Flag

1989 - LeBaron Coupe 2.5 turbo

Rice rocket slayer. Go America!!

All 1989 Chrysler LeBaron reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know
Model year1989
Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership1998
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.5 turbo Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired97000 miles
Most recent distance170000 miles
Previous carDodge Shadow
Date of Entry 31st May, 2008

All Chrysler LeBaron reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews