1989 Chrysler LeBaron review from North America
"Super, super car, in its category and for the money"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Radiator needed replacement, approx. 98,000 miles.
Head gasket needed replacement, approx. 150,000 miles.
General comments?
I have owned 2 LeBarons. A 1986 Mark Cross Convertible with 2.2 turbo and currently, a 1989 coupe 2.5 turbo. Both have been very enjoyable cars with really comfortable interiors and wonderful seats.
Power is more than adequate (remember, these are not high-performance turbos). Ride quality is very good, the ’86 had a feel like a larger American luxury car. The ’89 drives a bit tighter, more responsive, but still solid, and heavy (in a good way).
The small 4 cyl. Chrysler products from the '80s were, overall, very good cars. Please note - many of the earliest LeBarons came with 2.6L 4 cylinder Mitsubishi engines, and from 1990 - 1995 with 3.0L 6 cyl. Mitsubishis. Those engines were low power / performance, and a little costly to repair (ie: 3.0L water pump).
The Chrysler 4 cyl. engines, on the other hand, were well engineered and offered increased horsepower through the years. Yes, as most engines, they have their weaknesses (don't let them overheat - the aluminum head can warp). Generally, they were well-built and long-lived if maintained correctly.
The reader who posted on 29th Dec 2007 and said these cars were problematic was not well informed. The trannies were more than adequate - these were not high-performance cars even with the turbo, except the Turbo IV engine - only available with 5 speed.
There were occasional turbo problems, as almost all turbo-ed cars of the era had. This was because owners were never told to cool down the turbo before shutting off the engine!
I bought my '89 coupe 2.5 turbo at 97,000 miles. It drove so well, it felt like a car with no more than 40K miles - tight, solid, well-built, and no squeaks or rattles.
Sadly, Chrysler did cheapen the car in 1990 with a minor make-over, and went with the 3.0L Mits. engine I mentioned above. The car had more plastic content. For instance, although having an appealing dashboard design, it felt and looked cheap. They also didn’t stay tight and squeak-free into high mileage.
The ‘80s Chrysler, Dodge, and Plymouth with Chrysler 4 bangers, were economical, reliable, and comfortable.
Recommended reviews
| 1989 - LeBaron Turbo Coupe 2.5 turbo I want another one! |
| 1989 - LeBaron Coupe 2.5 turbo Rice rocket slayer. Go America!! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Model year | 1989 |
| Year of manufacture | 1989 |
| First year of ownership | 1998 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2008 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.5 turbo Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 97000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 170000 miles |
| Previous car | Dodge Shadow |
| Date of Entry | 31st May, 2008 |