1996 Chrysler Neon Highline review from North America
"Not worth the money"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
First day of delivery and the head gasket was not on the car. The problems were not going to stop there. I had issues with the vehicle ever since. Steering was sloppy and the brakes were soft. Things in the cab were loose all the time.
General comments?
This is the worst car for the snow. I had a 1995 5 speed after this one and it was much better. Don't get the automatic. The manual was much better.
Recommended reviews
| Still a great bang for the buck after five years |
| What a Joke... |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1996 |
| First year of ownership | 1996 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 1998 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.0 DOCH Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 6 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 4 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 27000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Honda Prelude |
| Date of Entry | 1st August, 2002 |