2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Touring review from Finland
"Styling, Practicality Go Hand in Hand"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
So far, nothing, very,
General comments?
My wife and I bought a brand new Chrysler PT Cruiser 2003 model (Touring) in July, 2003.
We've had the car now for about 4,5 months and driven about
6000 km:s with it and are just as happy with it as we were on the day we
bought it. You've all heard this before:
* cute looking car, styling a real masterpiece
* functionality inside very good
* good handling capabilities
* practical seats that can be folded according to one's needs
* seating position relatively high, good view of road
* very comfortable to drive, sit in for long trips.
There are also things I'm not so happy about, but they are minor
things like:
- petrol tank cap somewhat difficult to open/close sometimes
- hand brake position a bit awkward, should be closer to driver
- rear part of car gets very dirty in rainy/snowy weather.
One thing that was a pleasant surprise for me was the petrol/km rate.
After having read a lot of critical comments on different web pages
I decided to test it out myself. On a 1000 km return trip to another
part of Finland I received the following results (speed 80-100 km/hr, no AC on, winter tyres on) :
* petrol consumption, pure motorway driving: 7 l/100 km
* petrol consumption: half motorway/half town: 9,2 l/100 km.
It's also been interesting to see how different the pro:s and con:s can
be in different countries. I've noticed that in the USA many people seem
to get annoyed by things that don't have much importance over here, for
instance:
* the window up/down switches are OK to me (I use them maybe 2 times a year)
* the motor noise, we can legally drive 80/100/120 km per hour on our roads,
so there's no motor noise to speak of, in fact I've never driven this silent
a car before)
* acceleration is fast enough for me, with a 2.0 l engine and manual gearbox
(why would anyone want a car with automatic gears, beats me?)
My wife, who maybe was even more enthusiastic about the car than I was
when we actually bought it lists things she likes as follows.
* the colour (metallic red), styling, interior design (e.g. hand rest)
Whenever I pick her up from work she always seems to get in a good mood
when she lays her eyes on the car (so the "wow" factor still seems to work for her!).
Recommended reviews
| 2003 - PT Cruiser GT 2.4L turbo I can haul all my outdoor gear and/or family and the turbo adds a huge wow factor to a good car |
| 2003 - PT Cruiser GT Turbo 2.4L 4 cylinder turbo Fast, great performance, powerful, embarassing styling, and half decent quality |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 2003 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.0 Manual |
| Performance marks | 10 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 15 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 6400 kilometres |
| Previous car | Toyota Yaris |
| Date of Entry | 5th December, 2003 |