2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Touring Edition review from North America
"I love my PT Cruiser!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Not a thing!
However, the rear brakes squeak the first few times they are used every day. Not a problem, just a bit embarrassing.
General comments?
I love my PT Cruiser! Very versatile, very comfortable, and really cool looking!
Some of the car magazines moan that non-Turbo PTs are sluggish and underpowered. Perhaps if you're an aggressive, lead-footed driver that's true, but I've found that the "base" PT Cruiser has plenty of pep, and is plenty quick and nimble for normal, day to day driving.
Plenty of room for four normal adults; five in a pinch. Lots of cargo room with the clever "fold, tumble, remove" seats. Infrequently, I wish the cargo area was 48" wide, instead of 40", but that's just not possible in a car this size.
My only complaint is the gas mileage. I average 20 mpg, and my best is 24 mpg with a long highway trip. My clunky, old 1986 Toyota Corolla got around 30 mpg!
Recommended reviews
| 2003 - PT Cruiser Touring 2.4zl Very Reliable and Fun so far |
|
| 2002 - PT Cruiser GT (Turbo) 2.4 turbo Close to what it should have been when introduced |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2003 |
| Year of manufacture | 2003 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.4L Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 6 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 27 miles |
| Most recent distance | 13000 miles |
| Previous car | Chrysler Voyager |
| Date of Entry | 25th March, 2005 |