1989 Dodge Daytona Turbo 2 review from North America
"The horsepower is too high for reliability"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
New clutch at 30,000km.
Half shaft at 35,000km.
Brakes at 40,000km.
New transmission at 55,000km.
New engine at 60,000km.
New clutch at 64,000km.
New shocks at 66,000km.
Front axle half shafts at 68,000 km.
About 5 sets of tires by now (LOL).
Paint on top side of car flaking off in big chunks.
At 90,000 a new timing belt, power steering pump and hose.
95,000 - new starter.
The car is fun to drive, but is not really made to drive with a lead foot all the time. Wanted the gas mileage a 4 cylinder gave, but would get a Mustang V-8 for reliability next.
General comments?
Great handling, play with the boost and great performance for a 4 banger.
Recommended reviews
| 1989 - Daytona ES 2.5L 4 cylinder I still love my 15 year-old car! |
|
| 1988 - Daytona Shelby Z 2.2 turbo ll Dirt cheap used an absolute steal for the price |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1989 |
| First year of ownership | 1989 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.2L Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 6 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 124000 kilometres |
| Date of Entry | 3rd September, 2002 |