1986 Dodge Lancer ES review from North America
"Not an EVO, but still a trip!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
After putting up with quite a bit of abuse, the stock transmission went out. It was replaced with a new unit and has been acting fine.
The engine was rebuilt (cracked block) at 220,000 miles.
The turbo is VERY tempermental- sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but dealers and independent mechanics alike have no idea what's wrong.
The clear-coat has begun to oxidize and strip off severely.
General comments?
My first car. I love it to death. Excellent for a four-door, four cylinder car.
I'm addicted to the whistle of a turbocharger now, and the engine is very easily modified due to it's commonality across the Dodge/Chrysler line.
Recommended reviews
| I personally think the Dodge Lancer was a great car in history, and they should continue make them |
|
| A high performer, but a big fixer - the harder you drive the more you fix |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1986 |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.2L Turbocharged Automatic |
| Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 5 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 190000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 280000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 8th November, 2002 |