1997 Ford Aspire review from North America
"Low performance, not an economy car and an unreliable piece of equipment"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Well, the distributor and the cap were extremely expensive.
The car has left us behind sometimes.
Also, the engine is poor, and now it seems we need to rebuild the engine.
General comments?
Even with good care, Ford Aspire's are very unreliable, and the wear and tear is a lot more prevalent in this car than in any other vehicle I previously owned.
Recommended reviews
| Good for the money |
|
| 1996 - Aspire 1.3 liter fuel injected 4 cylinder inline Reliable, good gas mileage, low-performance, expensive to repair |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 1997 |
| First year of ownership | 1997 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | Don't Know |
| Performance marks | 2 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 3 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 1 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 0 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 miles |
| Most recent distance | 75000 miles |
| Previous car | Dodge Neon |
| Date of Entry | 23rd September, 2000 |