Similar Ford Focus reviews

2003
USA Flag Canada Flag

Focus ZTX

Good starter car

26 words
2002
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Focus LX

Well done Ford!!!

1360 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Focus ST170

An excellent performance hatch

1007 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Focus LX

A real mixed bag - I doubt I'd have another

716 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Focus Zetec

I would recommend this car to anyone

689 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Focus LX

As perfect a new car as can be realistically expected

656 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Focus zetec 2.0

Yes, it is as good as everyone says it is!

656 words
All Ford Focus reviews

2002 Ford Focus LX review from UK and Ireland

"A real mixed bag - I doubt I'd have another"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Auxiliary belt and tensioner at 32,000 miles (known fault and replaced with modified parts)

Makes its rear tyres go "stepped" on their inner edges which causes an irritating vibration and drone approximately every 20,000 miles. Happened three times now and dealer cannot find fault with geometry or suspension itself. Car has never been crashed.

Other than that, it's been faultless despite hard use.

General comments?

I have never had such mixed feelings about a car. On one hand, it's been incredibly reliable, very well put together and is still a lot of fun on a good winding B-road. On the other its coarse, noisy engine, awful seats and general lack of refinement (road din seems to have got worse in the last 20k) make me dislike it strongly at times.

To drive, the Focus is a mixed bag. The journos rave about the chassis, and it is good, although I still think my old 306 was slightly better. It managed to be just as sharp in the handling department, but rode better, and felt far better insulated from dodgy road surfaces. The Focus's steering is fabulous though and I haven't driven anything else with as much feel, or such perfect weighting and gearing.

The TDDi engine is awful. Crude, clattery, rumbly and smoky, it's all the bad stuff you've heard about diesels and more. When you start it up, it jolts into life with an undignified "clunk", which rattles coins in the tray or loose items in the doorbin. The clattering and rumbling under the bonnet subsides slightly as it warms, but never quite enough. In its defence however, it has been utterly reliable, and I've never even needed to top up the oil between services.

Performance is actually reasonable, with a decent spread of shove and an very well set up turbocharger installation with little lag, and good throttle response (for a diesel). There's none of the "nothing, wallop, nothing" delivery of a lot of turbodiesels, just a steady surge from 1500 RPM upwards, which is quelled only by the limiter at about 4,750 RPM. However, you find yourself turning up the CD player to drown out the din. Economy is good at about 45-50 mpg in day to day driving depending on driving conditions. I have never been below 40 mpg even thrashing it mercilessly.

I actually like the interior of the car. Yes the dash plastics could be of better quality, but at least it's not another bland German coal-hole design like the Golf's and even the new Focus's. Instead you have light colours, well co-ordinated trim, and a dash which achieves a striking design with clever use of geometric shapes. Build quality is actually superb. Nothing creaks or squeaks after 71k, it all works properly, and even things like the column stalks still operate crisply and without any slack.

The seats however are a joke, and should not have made it into a modern production car. Flat, hard, and bench-like, they provide no lateral support when cornering, and no upper back or thigh support whatsoever, meaning that aches and pains are part and parcel of any journey that exceeds around two hours. Oh, and Ford's idea of lumbar support is akin to sticking a slightly padded scaffold bar into your lower back. It's a shame because the basic driving position is first class. The seats in my wife's 2000 Mondeo are by comparison like my favourite armchair.

Dealers are what I expected really. Competent enough, but indifferent. Spending my own money, I wouldn't give them my business, especially on a car which is relatively easy to work on. It's not like a modern BMW with a dozen ECU's that need specialist attention. Ford ECU reading tools are readily available, and the mechanical bits are simple (read ancient).

So, the car goes back in a couple of weeks, and what have I chosen to replace it? A new Megane. Not as fun to drive hard, but the new dCi engines are a revelation, and the comfort and refinement of the car is beyond criticism at this price point. The new Focus was up there, but to me it felt dulled, heavy, bloated and still not as refined as the Renault. It's also terminally boring to look at. Time will tell if I regret my choice.

1 comment

United Kingdom Flag Search for New and Used Ford Focuss available in the UK

Click here to advertise your car

Recommended reviews

UK Flag Ireland Flag

2002 - Focus ST170 2.0 16v petrol

An excellent performance hatch

UK Flag Ireland Flag

2002 - Focus Zetec 1.8 16v

I would recommend this car to anyone

All 2002 Ford Focus reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 1.8 turbo diesel (DI) Manual
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 6.6 / 10
Distance when acquired11 miles
Most recent distance71000 miles
Previous carPeugeot 306
Date of Entry 22nd August, 2005

All Ford Focus reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews