Ford Galaxie Reviews - Page 2 of 5

1970 Ford Galaxie 500 Wagon Country Sedan V8, 351cid, 5.8 liters, gasoline from Mexico

Model year1970
Year of manufacture1970
First year of ownership1970
Most recent year of ownership1995
Engine and transmission V8, 351cid, 5.8 liters, gasoline Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 4 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.2 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance75000 kilometres
Previous carMercedes-Benz 220

Summary:

Great, memorable car, with lots of power and quality, but with a terrible fuel addiction

Faults:

- Electrical system, shortcut, after 20 years of life.

- Automatic transmission didn't engage quickly first gear in 1988.

- It was left in a sea house for many years unused in California, so it began a terrible corrosion process, quite extensive, mainly in parts where paint was scratched. This was due to my negligence, of course.

General Comments:

I used very little this car, almost nothing: in 1982 it had 13,000kms, in 1988 it had 53,000kms. It is a terrible thing that it was neglected so much. This was a fabulous car. The engine was solid as no other, strong, very powerfull; also it drank gasoline without limits.

The transmission was also very good and strong, but the car was saw very little service and this affected it at the end. It passed almost years unused, so that was the main reason of its problems, but I cannot remember of a more solid and well constructed car.

Something strange was that this was an expensive car at the time, but it didn't have A/C, nor even heating system, just ventilation -"conditioned" by the car's speed.

Those were the finest days of Ford, I believe. Construction quality was top-notch.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th June, 2007

27th May 2012, 09:15

The Galaxie 500 was not a particularly "expensive" car when new, so its lack of air conditioning is not unusual for a car from that era.

However, the only way it would not have had a heating system, was if someone had removed it. Heater/defrosters have been standard equipment in American cars at least since the early 60's.

27th May 2012, 14:01

People seem to forget how quickly cars of this era rusted out; even the floorboards. The cars of today last much longer, as they aren't rusty in 5-10 years as was common in that era.

1965 Ford Galaxie 500 289c.i.d. from North America

Year of manufacture1965
Engine and transmission 289c.i.d. Automatic
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
10.0 / 10
Previous carDodge Ram

Summary:

My '65 Galaxie does turn a lot of heads

Faults:

The oil pan gaskets leak a little.

The driver's side of the front seat has started to wear badly.

The weatherstripping is old and worn.

General Comments:

The car has an AM radio built in the dash that cannot be replaced. The power and sound this little 289 puts out beats a radio any day!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 22nd April, 2005

23rd Apr 2005, 04:59

A little 289 in a big ol two-ton Galaxie, yet you rate performance a 10/10, hmmmm...

1967 Ford Galaxie 500 390 V8 from North America

Model year1967
Year of manufacture1966
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 390 V8 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired78000 miles
Most recent distance85000 miles

Summary:

It's like a boat, only more fun

Faults:

It needed a new convertible top after sitting in storage for 25 years.

The voltage regulator went bad soon after I purchased the car.

One exhaust pipe rusted through.

The original valve cover gaskets rotted.

General Comments:

It handles very solidly at any speed and rides smoothly over bumps and rough roads.

The heater is amazing. It is so strong the car can be comfortable driven the top down even in the winter.

Except for height, this car is as big as most SUV's.

Acceleration is as quick as the nearly two ton curb weight allows for.

Surprising as it may seem, the car takes turns pretty well.

The factory drum brakes are not up to the task of controlling this car.

The engine is simple and easy to service and make repairs on.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 11th January, 2005

22nd Mar 2005, 12:02

This car is (a 1967 model) was manufactured on 23 June 1966 in Mahwah, NJ.

2nd Oct 2006, 10:30

I just got my '66 galaxie convertible and agree with everything said thus far, especially the braking system. After driving newer cars with power disc brakes, this car could put you in danger if you're not careful. With that said, it is an awesome car, easy to work on, and looks great!

23rd Aug 2009, 13:38

I had a '67 500 two door hardtop that I bought from my dad with 110,000 miles on it. It was a 240 6 cylinder with a three speed auto. It was a great car. The two door body and frame remained tight. The four door hardtop and the two door convertible both seemed to turn into "boats". The 390 that usually came was a dog. I don't know if a higher HP engine was available. My dad had the four door hardtop with a 390 also. I drove it a little. I thought it was a boat.

The two door hardtop was a different story. With the suspension set at the correct height (the Fords would sag, especially after a winter of heavy snow on their hoods), the car responded well on the road. It felt like a much smaller auto. Due to the advertising of the Plymouth GTX and the Hemi engine at the time, the sleeper Ford two door hardtop slept as a secret for those who owned one to enjoy.

Average review marks: 8.0 / 10, based on 15 reviews