1995 Ford Mustang review from North America
"Tough car, but HATE the rear wheel drive!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Alternator and brakes went out; other than that, I never had a problem with the car.
General comments?
Good power even with the V6; was super easy to work on.
Very nice sound system.
1995 body style even now looks up to date.
Biggest drawback and my #1 gripe is it's a REAR wheel drive car; it handles like pure crap when it rains, and if it snows, don't even drive it.
I would hydro-plane coming off a interstate ramp at 35 mph with brand new tires on it, just BS for this day and age.
I have NO IDEA why anyone would make a rear wheel drive car no days, other than the fact some idiots like to do doughnuts in the snow, or some stupid things like that.
If the Mustang were front wheel drive, I'd probably still have mine.
They are built very rugged and tough, the transmission is the same for the V8, and you won't tear that baby up.
Another gripe is just no room in the car, too small and uncomfortable, needs more leg room. Good for a small girl and that's about it.
Recommended reviews
| Still going strong after 14 years |
| Fun To Drive and a Real Head Turner! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 1995 |
| Year of manufacture | 1994 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2007 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.8 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 10 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 5 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 105000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 164000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Escort |
| Date of Entry | 12th February, 2008 |