2005 Ford Mustang from North America - Comments

Rust! Although they are only spots and not holes, they are still unexpected for the age of this car.

For it being a V6, it is decent in terms of acceleration, however, it is not in the same league as the GT. If you would rate the performance of the GT a 10 on a scale of 10, then the V6 would be a 5.

I regret not getting the GT and will be trading it in in the fall for a 2010 Mustang GT. The reason I chose the V6 over the GT in 2004 was due to the salesperson convincing me that I would be happier in the V6 (since he was overstocked with V6's and had no GT's left in his lot).

In four years you have driven it less than 15K miles?

Unless this car is a toy, you have to wonder why you would even own a car at all. Certainly would be cheaper to rent one when you needed it?

Yuck, a 3.8 with the automatic.

"In four years you have driven it less than 15K miles?"

Not unusual for car enthusiasts who own several cars. My 2007 Mustang has been driven exactly two years this month. It currently has 6700 miles. Due to the harsh ride we generally use our very smooth riding Fusion, our sporty, but smooth riding Pontiac, or our smooth and great riding GM SUV. If I drove the Mustang everywhere my dentist would have a field day replacing my jarred-out fillings and my chiropractor would get rich fixing my back. If you only own ONE car, it should NOT be a Mustang unless you are very young and in peak physical condition. They are awesome cars (even the new 4.0), but comfortable they are NOT.

"8th Jul 2009, 15:23.

In four years you have driven it less than 15K miles?

Unless this car is a toy, you have to wonder why you would even own a car at all. Certainly would be cheaper to rent one when you needed it?"

Not everybody drives 25,000 miles a year. I wonder why you feel the need to be so critical? Seems like you would be pleased that somebody is saving the environment by not having to drive so much.