1995 Ford Mustang GT from North America - Comments

4th Apr 2001, 22:42

"Legendary promise that falls short"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

With the promise of great looks and legendary performance, I thought the Ford Mustang would be a cool car. Wrong!

First week I owned it a valve broke and it ran and sounded like crap.

In two months the distributer gear broke and I had to get the pieces out of the engine.

Brakes failed at less than 50000.

Transmission leaked and shifted at too high rpms.

Ford 5.0 was very sluggish for an 8 cylinder. Could only beat small engine cars.

Nice looks but it started rusting behind the rear wheels. From then on I call Mustangs "Rustangs".

Rear suspension flimsy even after replacing springs and shocks.

Rear tires wore quickly.

Not very reliable.

Swallows gas like a drunk swallows booze.

General comments?

Next time I will get a Camaro. My 1980 Chevette was much more reliable. In my opinion the "Rustang" is not a real sports car.


12th Jan 2005, 18:06

Yet another person who thinks just b/c it's a mustang it must be a super car. They are not well performers in factory form, anyone who know mustangs know that. Take the effort and do a lil work to it.


21st Aug 2007, 14:39

The 1995 only came with 215hp from the factory. It was the lowest since the mid 80's gt.

The car has a lot of potential with minimal work. If you can turn a wrench there is easily another 50hp for less than $300 waiting.

I own one as well.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Ford Mustang reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews