Similar Ford Ranger reviews

2002
USA Flag Canada Flag

Ranger FX4 level II

What a blast to drive! Great 4WD truck

572 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Ranger Edge

Boring, basic, but very solid

553 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Ranger Tremor

Bang for the buck

427 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Ranger 2wd 4dr Edge Supercab

OK

423 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Ranger Edge

Built Ford tough and slow as a tank

348 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Ranger Edge

Very nice and a great buy

262 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Ranger Edge

I'm never buying a Ford again!

256 words
All Ford Ranger reviews

2002 Ford Ranger 2wd 4dr Edge Supercab review from North America

"OK"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Ironically enough, after the warranty ran out, the serpentine belt started to squeal. I had it replaced, and ever since, I have had to replace the damned thing every 6 months or so. Ford tells me it will squeal when worn. Why does the original belt last 5-6 years, then new belts wear in 5-6 months.

My clutch slave cylinder blew at 80,0000 km. What a scam that is. Back, when this great technology was not available, all I had to do, was to replace a clutch cable, which was a cheap and easy fix. Now, it is a major job. How wonderful these auto manufacturers are at creating high-tech garbage.

I am very mechanically inclined, and can tear motors apart, rebuild, etc. The Ford Ranger was my first brand new vehicle. I took it in, according to warranty specifications for the first two years, but decided to do the work myself after a particular incident. I took my truck in for the usual tune-up, and so called 50 point inspection. They (Ford) wrote on the report that the front brakes had 5% pads left, and recommended brake servicing. That was 3 years ago, and I have just changed the front and rear pads, myself. When they wanted me to bring my truck in for brake service, I decided to do the job myself, as brakes are quick and easy to replace. I bought the front and rear pads, then jacked my truck up and removed the wheels. I inspected the pads, and to my surprise, the pads were in pretty good shape. There was no way that they were worn down by 95% as they quoted. So, I never took my truck in for servicing again, and that was over 3 years ago.

By the way, I assumed the brakes would have to be done the next summer, but after 3 years past their quote, I finally put the new pads on, even though the original pads would have lasted another year at the least. So, buyer beware. If you have a good local, honest mechanic, you will save thousands of dollars by having him or her do the warranty tune-ups and inspections, rather than having so-called Ford technicians advise you on unneeded repairs. I am sure that dealers make much more money on parts and service than they could in any other way.

General comments?

Other than the dishonesty of dealer service departments, I have been happy with my Ranger. I believe that the Ford Ranger is the best of any domestic truck.

Comment on this review

Recommended reviews

USA Flag Canada Flag

2002 - Ranger Tremor 3.0 V6

Bang for the buck

USA Flag Canada Flag

2002 - Ranger Edge 2.3 Liter

Built Ford tough and slow as a tank

All 2002 Ford Ranger reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know
Model year2002
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 3.0 Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 2 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance80000 kilometres
Previous carToyota Corolla
Date of Entry 16th December, 2008

All Ford Ranger reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews