1999 Ford Ranger XLT review from North America
"As reliable and efficient as this is to drive, I don't plan to replace it for another 70,000 miles"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The anti-lock brake sensor malfunctioned around 78,000 miles.
An oxygen sensor malfunctioned around 65,000 miles.
General comments?
This truck was bought to hold me over for three years, but I've kept it for eight because it is extremely reliable, comfortable, and practical. After about 50,000 miles of driving it, the only thing wrong with it is a loose shift-pattern indicator on the gear shift knob.
Three other family members have purchased Ford Rangers, and none of us have had any problems with them, new or used.
The extended cab is okay for short trips, but excellent for storage. The area behind the front doors hinges out, making it easy to get into the seats or for placing groceries and tools. The extended cabs feel like they handle better on curves and over bumps as well.
Fuel mileage isn't a problem with this 6-cylinder vehicle. The truck averages 18 in city driving, and will reach 24 (sometimes 25) with highway driving.
Recommended reviews
| Does it all, but not like a full size truck will. |
|
| Good value, somewhat reliable |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1999 |
| Engine and transmission | 4.0 Manual |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 33500 miles |
| Most recent distance | 82657 miles |
| Previous car | Pontiac Bonneville |
| Date of Entry | 22nd December, 2008 |