1996 Ford Ranger XL 4x4 review from North America
"It's a beast and the chicks dig it!!!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The 4x4 went out stuck $1000 for new hubs and rebuld trancefer case.
The back bed under the topper gets used a lot, but now its broken.
General comments?
The bed is nice.
Great running truck.
Recommended reviews
| Underrated great little pickup |
| 1995 - Ranger XL Super Cab 2.3L 4-cylinder A good truck, but not a great one |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1996 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 4.0 V6 4x4 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 1 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 110000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 128000 miles |
| Previous car | pontac sunbird |
| Date of Entry | 31st October, 2002 |