2006 Ford Ranger XL review from North America
"Good truck for the money"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Binding throttle cable.
General comments?
2.3 4 banger runs excellent and I get 26 mpg overall.
Manual transmission could be a little more precision.
Seats and driving position could be improved.
The XL trim level had no option available for alloy wheels.
Full size spare should be standard instead of optional.
A comparably equipped Toyota Tacoma would be 3-4 thousand $ more.
Recommended reviews
| 2006 - Ranger Sport Regular Cab 3.0 litre V6 The ONLY choice in a small truck |
|
| Not Impressed |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Model year | 2006 |
| Year of manufacture | 2005 |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2006 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.3 Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 12 miles |
| Most recent distance | 16000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford F150 |
| Date of Entry | 21st November, 2006 |