1992 Ford Taurus L review from North America
What things have gone wrong with the car?
A. Rear and front brakes replaced twice.
B. Rotors and drums replaced, cost $900 for A + B.
C. Headlights are difficult to adjust.
General comments?
Good design, poor and cheap materials used for brakes.
Recommended reviews
| Good car for Grandpa |
|
| A definate bagain for my uses, and hope it helps you out too! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0l v6 |
| Performance marks | 9 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 5 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Date of Entry | 16th June, 1998 |