1991 Ford Taurus GL review from North America
"A possible money trap"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The CV boots ripped at 68,000 miles.
The transmission went out at 72,000 miles.
General comments?
There shouldn't be any reason the transmission went out. I bought it from a Grandma who only put 8,000 miles on it in the 6 years she owned it.
The car is somewhat doggy for a V6.
Recommended reviews
| Well worth the money |
|
| Best and most reliable car I've seen!!! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1991 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 5 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 6 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 56000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 72000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Escort |
| Date of Entry | 10th December, 2001 |