1995 Ford Taurus GL review from North America
"Don't buy unless you are willing to spend some money"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Light module at 132,000 kilometres.
Transmission blew at 140,000.
Head gasket blew at 149,000.
Water pump at 150,000.
Fuel pump at 155,000.
General comments?
Not a bad car in general.
Has cost me too much money to run.
The transmission cost me.
Recommended reviews
| A quality automobile from a quaility car maker! |
|
| A poor design and a real reliability headache |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.8 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 6 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 129000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 162000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Chevette |
| Date of Entry | 2nd July, 2002 |