1995 Ford Taurus GL review from North America
"A reliable second car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
We drove the car approximately 100,000 miles when it received it's first tune up on the engine. Prior to that we replaced the radiator at approximately 65,000 miles.
General comments?
The car is somewhat under powered for my liking, but performs adequately in city driving. Our car is fitted with the standard cloth bench seat with armrest. The seating is not conducive to long periods of travel. The car handles relatively well, but you experience every bump and dip in the road. We originally purchased the car as a second car and, overall, we are pleased with it. It has proved to be a reliable vehicle.
Recommended reviews
| A quality automobile from a quaility car maker! |
|
| A poor design and a real reliability headache |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 1998 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 5 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 29000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 106000 miles |
| Previous car | Buick Century |
| Date of Entry | 17th March, 2003 |