1993 Ford Taurus GL review from North America
"A piece of junk that isn't worth it"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Brakes: I have had to replace the rotors twice as they have been ruined with ease. I have replaced the front brake pads 3 times, and the rear drum brakes once (a very expensive repair).
Lights: The guage cluster died on me at 94,000 miles.
Engine: The engine doesn't run well between 30-35 miles per hour. It stutters as the transmission tries to shift. I also have to by supreme gasoline for the car (92 octane) otherwise the engine pings like it is about to die.
Transmission: This transmission is so weak it is unbelievable. It only works well on flat roads; if you go uphill it is a good idea not to stop because you might not be able to start again.
General comments?
Positives: I have been in 3 accidents with this car (none my fault), and it has survived well (only minor dings). She also has good low end acceleration.
The car has gotten me where I want to go, but I would never buy another Taurus again unless it was a SHO. This car is not worth it. I have probably spent $7,000 on repairing this car, and I continue to regret it.
Recommended reviews
| 1993 - Taurus GL Sedan 3.0L V6 A very good mid-sized sedan, get the 3.0L engine! |
|
| 1992 - Taurus SHO 3.0 Liter 24 valve A Street Fighter in Old Dockers and Topsiders |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 1993 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 0 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 1 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 0 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 0 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 74000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 111000 miles |
| Previous car | Honda Accord |
| Date of Entry | 8th July, 2003 |