1991 Ford Taurus LX review from North America
What things have gone wrong with the car?
- Rust all over.
- Head gaskets.
- Rebuilt transmission.
General comments?
This was previously my fathers car, and as you can see, he put a very low amount of mileage on it..
As I can recall, the performance was a lot better when he first had it.
I wouldn't buy a Taurus from the years 89-91, unless it is an SHO (Manual transmission, and Yamaha-made engine). They seemed to improve after this, so I guess Ford is learning.
Recommended reviews
| Well worth the money |
|
| Best and most reliable car I've seen!!! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1991 |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0L V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 0 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 3 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 90000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 115000 kilometres |
| Date of Entry | 22nd August, 2000 |