1997 Ford Taurus review from North America
"Crap"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The transmission went bad.
General comments?
Would not buy another 97 we had the sedan a 96 and that wa great.
Recommended reviews
| Good, and the work is worth it |
|
| One big headache |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 1997 |
| Year of manufacture | 1997 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 3 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 4 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 4 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 4 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 80000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 89000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Taunus |
| Date of Entry | 23rd December, 2005 |