1995 Ford Taurus GL review from North America
"Reliable, great on gas on long hauls"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Nothing.
General comments?
I bought this car from a friend at work, didn't see the car or even drive it. I paid $3000 for it, have had it 1.5yrs and I don't think twice about taking off on long trips with it. My last car, a grand Prix, which I bought new, was so unreliable I had to borrow friends cars so I could take off on long trips.
My ford maybe be boring to drive, but it sure is trust worthy, and in awsome shape, only one small rust spot, other than that, the car is original.
Recommended reviews
| A quality automobile from a quaility car maker! |
|
| A poor design and a real reliability headache |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 1995 |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2006 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 102000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 135000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Pontiac Grand Prix |
| Date of Entry | 8th June, 2006 |