1992 Ford Thunderbird LX review from North America
"Thunderbird LX one of the finest luxurious performance vehicles in one package"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Nothing has gone wrong with my Thunderbird, but everything went wrong with my Daytona.
General comments?
I have come to realize that my Ford has been far more dependable than my Dodge. I haven't had a single problem with my Thunderbird, it hasn't had any unplanned visits to the mechanic. Where as my Daytona never got out of the mechanics hands. I spent far more money on the Daytona than I could spend on performance parts for my loyal Thunderbird.
Recommended reviews
| 1992 - Thunderbird Base 3.8L V6 Very Reliable and Cheap to Maintain |
|
| A serious waste of $ and space on earth |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | 5.0 HO Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 74000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 79986 miles |
| Previous car | Dodge Daytona |
| Date of Entry | 19th October, 2000 |