1995 Geo Metro review from North America
"Decent car, poor performance, good economy"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Transmission at 56,000.
Replaced clutch at the same time as it was weak.
Typical headlight switch problems.
General comments?
Rides better than other cars in the same category (Ford Festiva, Aspire, etc.)
If you have 3 passengers, holding 70 is a challange... way underpowered.
Low fuel consumption.
Excellent starter, even in -25.
Recommended reviews
| No better car for young people |
|
| Okay, but some problems |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.0 liter Manual |
| Performance marks | 2 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 2 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 55000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 77000 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Metro |
| Date of Entry | 21st April, 2003 |