1993 Geo Metro Convertible review from North America
"Long lasting friend"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I've not had any real problems with the car besides the usual things brakes, battery, spark plugs. Just simple things like that.
General comments?
I have kept this car as well as you can, everything in the owners manual has been done when it was supposed to be done and on time, it's never missed an oil change or transmission service.
I was please to see that it held up better than my neighbor's Honda Civic, he said that my Geo wouldn't last 50,000 miles when I got it and it has outdone his Civic. I'm about to replace the convertible top this winter.
Recommended reviews
| Great car -- start making them again |
|
| It's Okay |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1993 |
| First year of ownership | 1994 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.0 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 260 miles |
| Most recent distance | 189662 miles |
| Date of Entry | 31st July, 2000 |