1995 Geo Metro Sedan review from North America
"A reliable cost effective must"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Not a lot.
It uses a little oil.
It had an electrical problem with one of the headlights, but it was only $20.00 to have fixed.
The catalytic converter is just now developing a rust hole in the top, and there are no converters available for the 1995 yet, which is kind of a pain.
Nothing too major yet, just basic maintenance for a car with 100,000 miles.
General comments?
I love my car, it has low payments, very price effective. It gets great gas mileage, and has never left me stranded. It has some get up and go, because it is a manual. I have no real complaints. I would suggest it to anyone.
Recommended reviews
| No better car for young people |
|
| Okay, but some problems |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 1998 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.3 liters Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 3 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 80000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 106000 miles |
| Previous car | toyota corolla |
| Date of Entry | 20th August, 2000 |