1997 Geo Metro lsi review from North America
"''very good cost efficient car''"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
When I got the car it was in rough shape
it had been used in PA in the salt
and things were kind of rusty.
The paint was poor so I painted it.
Even though it had the better part of 160000
miles, the engine ran smooth as could be.
It only cost me about 160 dollars to restore.
This car back to the road. i love this little.
Car and would highly recommend it to any body.
Who commutes long distances each day. I get 42.
Mpg even when I run it hard.
General comments?
This car is a good economy car. it is fairly cost efficient to operate.
This car is not a performance car and doesnt handle to well around corners at high speeds.
Overall the car is a good deal and is ideal for a youngster or working person.
Recommended reviews
| 1997 - Metro LSI 1.3L 4 cylinder Economical and reliable, but expensive to repair when something does happen |
|
| 1996 - Metro 1.0 Liter, 3 cylinder Most economical car you are going to find |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 1997 |
| Year of manufacture | 1996 |
| First year of ownership | 2006 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.0 gasoline Manual |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 167000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 169000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Ranger |
| Date of Entry | 11th September, 2006 |