1994 Geo Tracker LSi review from North America
"The best entry-level S.U.V on the market"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Horn had to be replaced.
Front exhaust component from the engine to the catalytic converter.
General comments?
This is the second Geo model I have owned. Buying a used car is always risky business, however my Geo's have been more reliable than some of my friend's brand new cars. For example, my friend's Neon transmission had to replaced after one year of use.
I have absolutely no regrets about buying this vehicle. Excellent quality for an entry-level S.U.V.
Some interior components seem brittle, so I am careful and have not had a problem yet.
Recommended reviews
| The tracker WAS reliable even with exterior problems |
|
| Highly Reliable, Cheap to Operate |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1994 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6 Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 90000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 112000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Geo Metro |
| Date of Entry | 6th June, 2001 |