1990 Honda Accord EX review from North America
"Warning: Honda sucks!!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Transmission never hesitated to give us problems (after all, it's a Honda).
Rust in several places.
Interior fell apart very easily.
General comments?
To those who know cars, Honda is known for several things: weak transmissions, cramped and flimsy interiors, lack of personality, and poor build quality. The Accord never hesitated to prove those stereotypes correct. In my book, Honda is one of the worst makes. Period. Don't waste time with this overpriced garbage. A Kia or Hyundai offers better build quality, more features, a better warranty, and a better price than any Honda ever has.
Recommended reviews
| Out of six Hondas I have owned, this has been a lemon and I advise to avoid automatic transmissions! |
|
| 1989 - Accord LX-i 2.0 liter, Fuel Injected (122 bhp model) OK commuter choice, but not great |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model year | 1990 |
| Year of manufacture | 1990 |
| Engine and transmission | Four-cylinder gas Automatic |
| Performance marks | 4 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 2 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 2 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 6 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Previous car | Honda Civic |
| Date of Entry | 5th February, 2005 |