1976 Honda Civic Reviews - Page 2 of 2

1976 Honda Civic 1.2 petrol from Australia and New Zealand

Year of manufacture1976
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2001
Engine and transmission 1.2 petrol Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired150000 kilometres
Most recent distance200000 kilometres
Previous carMitsubishi Galant

Summary:

Very cheap, unexpectedly fun

Faults:

The factory 4 speed blew apart (my fault)

General age problems (e.g rust)

Started to use a bit of oil.

General Comments:

Definitely a Japanese Mini, but far better than a mini.

The 1.2 is surprisingly quick and the whole car took a good thrashing with only a gearbox eventually giving up.

Handled really well, never managed to spin it out with oversteer.

Interior was a bit lacking as with most car of its time, not exactly inviting on a cold morning.

Parts are really cheap.

Never had an engine problem that a tune up didn't fix.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th June, 2001

1976 Honda Civic Station Wagon 1.5 from North America

Year of manufacture1976
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2000
Engine and transmission 1.5 Manual
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 3 / 10
Comfort marks 3 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.5 / 10
Distance when acquired211000 miles
Most recent distance211500 miles
Previous carVolvo 145 S

Summary:

The best $5 I ever spent

Faults:

Since I've had it I have replaced a battery terminal, radiator, the turn signal flasher canister, and a rear driver's brake cylinder.

I also have had to clean and adjust all three jets in the carb and the gas pedal linkage, I'm about to do a CV joint.

General Comments:

I've had it for a month and it is a very good little car, with a little more love and small adjustment it will be very reliable. I'm 16 and this is my first street legal car and I would recommend it to anyone, it has been really inexpensive, I paid $5 for it and have invested $35 in parts. I've driven it a lot and it is also very inexpensive to run.

P.S.

It also does really well off-roading too, even though the yellow doesn't let the dirt show up as well as I would like it to!!!!!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th October, 2000

12th Jun 2002, 14:31

I also am sixteen and own a 1976 Honda civic c.v.c.c. 1500cc, but it is not a station wagon. I Would like to say that with very little money these cars can rock. I Know that yellow isn't the best color that these cars could be painted, but it makes it look like a big M@M. Thanks.

4th Jul 2007, 09:41

"It also does really well off-roading too"

I see this car won't be around much longer.

3rd Aug 2007, 19:03

Yep, the 1976 Honda is a honey. My mom loved her CVCC and called her the "Ladybug." She even had my dad paint it a deep orange, and was looking for him to add the black spots (which he didn't). Of course, now the orange is a "hot" color!

Sadly, Mom is no longer able to drive it, so it sits.

Can't really see just letting it go for "$5," since it has a newly-rebuilt engine, etc., but I hope to find someone who will love it as much as she did, kinda like these young ladies do theirs!

And the gas mileage MUST be better than an SUV! ; D.

15th Apr 2009, 13:06

I had a yellow 1976 Honda Civic back in 1987 when I was 16 as my first car. It was a great car, and at that time had 135,000 miles on it. I sold it for the same amount I paid for it at that time, $650, to a local guy and I saw it around town every now and then. What a car. Now I own a 1996 Honda Accord with 174,000 miles on it. It will probably run forever too.

Average review marks: 6.9 / 10, based on 4 reviews