1992 Honda Civic DX review from North America
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The car has now reached 139,000 km. I have been told that I need a new or rebuilt engine, a new distributor, spark plugs, timing belt, along with the general tune-up parts and possibly a new computer.
General comments?
I am disappointed with my Honda and thought Honda was a brand that lasted a long time without major repairs such as a new engine.
Recommended reviews
| Reliable, affordable, and great on gas at 234K! Doesn't get better than this! |
| Good no-nonsense car |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | Manual |
| Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 6 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 108000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 139000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Toyota Tercel |
| Date of Entry | 6th June, 2001 |