1989 Honda Civic Standard Sedan review from Australia and New Zealand
"Good for NZ$2700"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Rust was a hidden problem until bubbles appeared in the paint.
Not a luxurious model (no central, A/C, electrics).
Seals of front windows leaked.
Transmission a bit worn.
General comments?
I had an accident with a 1990 Mazda Capella Wagon going at 50+kph. My vehicle was static before the collision. Both cars were written off. It was head on.
Neither me nor the passenger were injured, only slight back pain. The bonnet crumpled well, seatbelts restrained well. The bedy held its form. Thus undoubtedly a moderately to superiorly safe car. You decide.
Recommended reviews
| Honda has got to be kicking themselves for building such an excellent car |
|
| Reliable, but not a sports car |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1989 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6L Manual |
| Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 190000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 195000 kilometres |
| Date of Entry | 27th August, 2002 |