2003 Honda Civic Type-S from UK and Ireland - Comments

13th Apr 2004, 07:49

"Good performance utilitarian"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Nothing yet.

General comments?

Fairly quick for this class of car. Performs better than the Focus ST170 I tested against it. You need to keep the revs up high as with any vtec. Nowhere near as quick off the mark as the Corrolla 1.8 VVTiL T-Sport I had before.

Build quality is lightweight. The doors feel like polystyrene. Again the Toyota was solid and heavy.

The paintwork is pretty much paper-thin and I'm sometimes worried that washing it might take a huge flake off.

The glove compartment door sticks a lot and looks very insubstantial.

Handling at higher speeds and on tight corners isn't the best. Feels like an old Range Rover when hitting a roundabout at speed, pitching and rolling.

Equipment is good with half leather interior, climate control and decent legroom in the back. Lacks a sunroof.

Inconspicuous looks say "old man" but the engine can surprise boy racers.

Fuel consumption is on the heavy side even on long steady journeys.

5 doors are a must with a family!


6th Oct 2004, 04:34

A superb car, however I too am not very impressed with the fuel economy. When one dealer did a test they got 57mpg, which is totally stupid. Another dealer got 40mpg on a 60 mile route.

I average 33mpg after ~6,000 miles on various roads (car had done 6,000 when I got it), I expected better than my 2litre Mondeo which averaged ~35mpg over similar journeys.

There is also some hesitation at low revs, especially in 2nd gear, which Honda do not seem to be able to sort out.

Terry.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Honda Civic reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews