Similar Honda CR-V reviews

2005
USA Flag Canada Flag

CR-V SE

Unless you like lemons, DON'T BUY THIS CAR!!!

53 words
2004
Mexico Flag

CR-V EX

Good car, unreliable dealer

446 words
Indonesia Flag

CR-V Auto

CR-V = Cr-ashy Riding Vehicle or Catastrophic Reliability Vehicle

359 words
Philippines Flag

CR-V

I love it to bits! (banal but true)

326 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

CR-V SE Sport

Another Honda Masterpiece

156 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

CR-V SE Sport Sat Nav

Excellent practical and reliable car that is also great fun to drive a relatively inexpensive to own

132 words
Australia Flag New Zealand Flag

CR-V Sport

Without doubt the best car I've ever bought

90 words
All Honda CR-V reviews

2004 Honda CR-V review from Philippines

"I love it to bits! (banal but true)"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

So far, nothing. Absolutely nothing.

General comments?

The first thing I can say about the car is that it has a very conservative look. I honestly think Honda played it too safe and made a boring looking car.

Despite the no frill look of this car, the same cannot be said for what is underneath the bonnet. OR SO THEY SAY. The truth is, the car's so called "genius" i-VTEC engine feels sluggish in this car. It doesn't go as well as my old 12 year old Nissan Altima did. And the the fuel economy was about the same. What I do love about the CR-V's engine is also its downfall: the high revving engine. It feels smooth and good to drive. The truth is, I don't think its the go that annoys me, its the cruise. When you press the gas, it goes well enough really. But when you release the gas to keep a constant pace, the car slows down very quickly. I initially thought it was due to the drag forces or maybe the low range gear box. But our Nissan X-Trail doesn't suffer from the same problems despite the bulk or the low range gear box.

The interior is better than the X-Trail's though. Whereas the Nissan used too much cheap high gloss plastic, the CR-V at least tries to mask the cheap look of its plastics. The gear shift is well placed, easily in reach. The seats are nicely shaped and molded, but too hard. (can't recommend this car for old people) But the car is very fuel efficient for a SUV or a Crossover as it really is, and very practical.

The drive is good, if a bit slow. The gears shift smoothly and quietly, without the "thud" of my old Nissan Altima's pathetic gearbox. The suspensions are hard, giving this car a sharp and responsive handling. But despite hardness, still doesn't punish you too much at the bumps or pot holes.

1 comment

Recommended reviews

Indonesia Flag

2004 - CR-V Auto 2.0 i-VTEC petrol

CR-V = Cr-ashy Riding Vehicle or Catastrophic Reliability Vehicle

USA Flag Canada Flag

2003 - CR-V EX 2.4L

Too computerized and untested to operate away from a gentle climate and a nearby dealer to baby it

All 2004 Honda CR-V reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Model year2005
Year of manufacture2004
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.0L 4x2 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired45000 kilometres
Most recent distance65000 kilometres
Previous carNissan Altima
Date of Entry 18th March, 2008

All Honda CR-V reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews