Similar Honda CR-V reviews

2003
USA Flag Canada Flag

CR-V

Great, until you have to fix it

55 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

CR-V LX

A lemon

47 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

CR-V EX

One of the best cars I have bought so far

39 words
2002
USA Flag Canada Flag

CR-V LX

Well, at least it's not MY car..

447 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

CR-V LX

The car is good, but the design is relatively poor on the wheel well, CV boot, and Steering wheel

359 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

CR-V LX

Decent Vehicle, Bad dealer

344 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

CR-V

320 words
All Honda CR-V reviews

2002 Honda CR-V LX review from North America

"Well, at least it's not MY car.."

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Engine needed to have a tune-up. (Probably a small isolated issue though)

Parking brake handle cracked due to extreme force needed.

General comments?

When the lease was up on our Explorer, my wife wanted something a little more economical. We were considering getting a Ford Escape, but the Ford Dealer was too far away (it was always a pain in the Explorer to drive accross town to change the oil), and the Honda Dealer was nearby. Her sister owned a 1999 CR-V, and said she loved it, so it ended up being her choice.

The new 2002 CR-V has more power, something it most certainly needs. But it's still sluggish with the Automatic transmission. It's got "just enough" power for all of your basic needs, but when you need to STEP ON IT, it takes its own time.

I wish this thing had a V6. The advantage to having a 4 cylinder engine however is fuel economy, which is good, but not great. It doesn't guzzle as much as the Explorer did, but it's kind of dismal for a 4 cylinder. If you live where it is flat, than you'll probably be experiencing the benefits of this SUV more than we are.

The CR-V is crammed with clever goodies. The kids love the picnic table. It's reasonably roomy in the back, too, every bit as much as the Explorer.

So what's not to like? Other than the shortage of power, the dashboard. My wife says she doesn't mind it, but I can't stand it. The radio is around a foot above the HVAC controls, which are positioned absurdly low. And the parking brake, which has cracked under its own recalcitrance. Also the cheap-o plastic interior gets my thumbs down.

I should also mention that one of my kids gets real car-sick in this car. His friend's drive a Tribute, and he's fine in that. I suspect the seating position.

And on a personal note, I find the styling of this SUV... well... mommy-ish. It's just NOT a guy vehicle. And on the inside... well, let's just say the inside is neither contemporary, timeless, or attractive.

The only real problem came from an Engine that needed to be tuned up rather early. The dealer was rude at first, but became jovial after realizing we were right.

It's an OK vehicle. Mediocre. Blah. Mommy-ish. We're giving it another six months, otherwise we might end our lease early. If so, we may buy an Escape or Liberty (both of which we have test-driven now and like very much.) I'd strongly reccomend shopping around before buying this SUV. I think there are better alternatives, but then again, the CR-V just isn't my vehicle.

1 comment

Recommended reviews

USA Flag Canada Flag

2003 - CR-V LX 2.4

What happened to Honda quality?

USA Flag Canada Flag

2002 - CR-V LX 4

The car is good, but the design is relatively poor on the wheel well, CV boot, and Steering wheel

All 2002 Honda CR-V reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 160 HP 4 cylinder Automatic
Performance marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 2 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 4.6 / 10
Distance when acquired20 miles
Most recent distance5231 miles
Previous carFord Explorer
Date of Entry 3rd June, 2002

All Honda CR-V reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews