2003 Honda CR-V SE Executive review from UK and Ireland
"Disappointing"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The back window did not fit from standard.
Wheel bearings disintegrated.
Brakes have warped.
The clutch is slipping and the dealer tells me that this is pretty common, it will need to be replaced.
Unexplained uneven tyre wear.
General comments?
I traded from the Freelander because I believed that it would be more reliable having had a few problems with my Land Rover, however, they were nothing quite as bad as I experienced with the Honda.
Trade in value is weak for this type of car, the Land Rover was better.
This car has no off road ability.
Dealer service is excellent, it is just the car that is bad.
Search for New and Used Honda CR-Vs available in the UK
Click here to advertise your car
Recommended reviews
| 2004 - CR-V SE Sport Sat Nav 2.0 petrol Excellent practical and reliable car that is also great fun to drive a relatively inexpensive to own |
| Reliable, practical family transport that's a bit different from the average estate car |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 2003 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.0 petrol Manual |
| Performance marks | 2 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 1 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 3 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 4 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 miles |
| Most recent distance | 10500 miles |
| Previous car | Land Rover Freelander |
| Date of Entry | 27th July, 2004 |