1991 Honda CRX review from UK and Ireland
"Lovely"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Nothing.
General comments?
I've had a CRX for 6 years and inbetween spent 22k on a Lotus Elise. Don't get me wrong, the Lotus was a top car, but that's gone now (10k lighter!) and my CRX is still going strong. The biggest compliment I could give it is that no one ever has a bad word to say about it, it's quicker than most at the lights, (except when you get your clutch control wrong and it pulls away like a high pitched brick), but hey, I love this car, it gets you from A - B with a touch of pace, It doesn't let you down, it had some class back in the days (and maybe it retains that to this day?) and it doesn't go round the World of Leather roundabout (Sidcup) backwards when you're smashed and egging your missus on to put the accelerator down in your motor (as an Elise does!) Look, if your reading this, (and bearing in mind I'm writing on the site) then you need to get a life, but at the end of the day, when I have to call the end to the CRX's days, I'll miss that car and... well make up your own ending. Chas.
P.S. I went out with two very lovely women who both had a CRX, so it can't be too bad!
Search for New and Used Honda CRXs available in the UK
Click here to advertise your car
Recommended reviews
|
| Head turning, lady pleasing, friend impressing rocket car :) |
|
| Fast, fun, affordable. Everyone should have one! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1991 |
| First year of ownership | 1997 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | mugan tweaked Don't Know |
| Performance marks | 9 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 55000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 89000 miles |
| Previous car | Lotus Elise |
| Date of Entry | 9th October, 2003 |