2002 Land Rover Freelander S review from North America
"A great, small "Cute-Ute", but does not have what it takes to be a true Land Rover."
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Transmission had to be replaced at 27,000 miles.
The transmission replaced at 27,000 miles was re-built and not new, it failed at 36,000 miles and this time the dealer ordered a new transmission.
Right rear passenger door strap needed to be replaced.
Starter cylinder failed.
Power door lock on left rear passenger door failed.
General comments?
Lacks true low-range gearing.
Overall torque of 177 pounds-feet is a bit low for off-road use.
Extremely solid frame.
Very agile on road and quite capable in light-moderate off-road use.
Freelander's off-road ability does not live up to the Land Rover name.
Recommended reviews
| Nice |
|
| 2002 - Freelander S 2.5V6 petrol Fine car, but high risk of failure and expensive to service and repair |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 2002 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.5 liter V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 4 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 4 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 4 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 102 miles |
| Most recent distance | 60921 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Beretta |
| Date of Entry | 31st August, 2004 |