2000 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE review from North America
"Tragically both Rovers I owned were trash"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Sun Roof.
Door locks.
Exhaust.
Navigation.
Brakes.
General comments?
I loved the Range Rover concept and
despite the every icreasing costs of
supporting my original 96 I opted to
purchase a 2000 Rover. Again I was
confronted with a navigation system which locked and could not be corrected
by the dealer. Despite my purchase
of updated discs. My original car self
destructed at 50,000 miles requiring
a $6000 brake overhaul. The car was
constantly at the dealership.
Recommended reviews
| Get a Volvo 4x4 if you want quality |
|
| 1999 - Range Rover HSE 4.6 V8 petrol The Range Rover is very poor value for money |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | V8 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 1 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 0 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 miles |
| Most recent distance | 30000 miles |
| Previous car | land rover 4.0 |
| Date of Entry | 14th February, 2003 |